John Savage - Definition. Was ist John Savage
Diclib.com
Wörterbuch ChatGPT
Geben Sie ein Wort oder eine Phrase in einer beliebigen Sprache ein 👆
Sprache:     

Übersetzung und Analyse von Wörtern durch künstliche Intelligenz ChatGPT

Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:

  • wie das Wort verwendet wird
  • Häufigkeit der Nutzung
  • es wird häufiger in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Rede verwendet
  • Wortübersetzungsoptionen
  • Anwendungsbeispiele (mehrere Phrasen mit Übersetzung)
  • Etymologie

Was (wer) ist John Savage - definition


John Savage (died 1586)         
ENGLISH CONSPIRATOR (16TH CENTURY)
John Savage (died 20 September 1586) was an English Catholic, who was one of the conspirators executed for his involvement in the Babington Plot, a plot in 1586 to assassinate Queen Elizabeth, a Protestant, and put Mary, Queen of Scots, a Catholic, on the English throne. A former soldier, Savage was to have been the man who would personally assassinate Elizabeth.
John Savage (surveyor)         
AMERICAN SURVEYOR (18TH CENTURY)
John Savage was an 18th-century surveyor of colonial Virginia. He surveyed as part of a 1736 expedition to settle a boundary dispute between Lord Fairfax and the English Privy Council concerning the extent of the vast Northern Neck land grant.
John Savage (actor)         
AMERICAN ACTOR
John Savage (born John Smeallie Youngs) is an American actor, best known for his roles in the films The Deer Hunter (1978), The Onion Field (1979), Hair (1979) and Salvador (1986). He is also known for his role as Donald Lydecker in the TV series Dark Angel.
Beispiele aus Textkorpus für John Savage
1. John Savage, executive chairman, said campaigners were "rubbing the noses [of Bristolians]" in the horrors of slavery long after an apology could be meaningful.
2. However, speaking for the officers, Humberside Police Federation chairman John Savage said: "All of the officers involved are deeply disappointed by the outcome of this review and strongly dispute the IPCC‘s findings.